Phase 4 (01.01.2017 – 30.09.2017)

Activities

  • WP2: HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTATION SERVICES IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT

A.IV.1. Legislative and organisational recommendations

  • WP3: HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTATION PLATFORM AND SERVICES

A.IV.2. HPC platform implementation

A.IV.3. Install, develop and configure required software to support HPC services for scientific research and business activities

A.IV.4. Consultancy and technical support for HPC platform usage by scientific and entrepreneurial communities

  • WP4: SPECIFIC CASE STUDIES FROM SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT

A.IV.5. Case study on using SaaS in scientific research and entrepreneurial development

A.IV.6. Case study on using PaaS in scientific research and entrepreneurial development

A.IV.7. Case study on using IaaS in scientific research and entrepreneurial development

A.IV.8. Consultacy and technical support for development of scientific and entrepreneurial applications

  • WP5: EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF THE PLATFORM AND PROVIDED HPC SERVICES

A.IV.9. Evaluation and experimental validation on SaaS usage by economical organisations

A.IV.10. Evaluation and experimental validation on PaaS usage in scientific and entrepreneurial applications

A.IV.11. Evaluation and experimental validation on HPC IaaS usage by scientific and entrepreneurial communities

Results

(1) experimental validation of the solution designed in Phase 1 and implemented in Phases II and III of the project, both on hardware and software levels

(2) installation and configuration of the software resources identified to be necessary to the beneficiaries in their research and business activities

(3) publicly announcement of the resources and services available on the HPC platform and offer consultancy and technical support

(4) actively support the development of research activities in the SMEs from TETAROM Industrial Park and Cluj-Napoca area

(5) dissemination of the project’s results and their validation through specialised experience exchanges with other scientific and technological parks

(6) identification of best practices and formulation of legislative recommendations